On the topic of getting organized, I am still following one of the Covey principles: First Things First. It’s a great discipline to balance important vs. urgent topics.
I suspect that Justin’s discussion about his spouse difference of opinion about his startup focus is probably striking a chord with a lot of us. I guess we all have to “hang in there” and continue to “believe”! 🙂
]]>As someone who also works from home, I found the discussion on time management very interesting. I’ve been known to have 2 hour naps, but the idea of the 20 minute nap seems like an idea worth trying.
My daily routine does also follow the idea of starting with the smaller, easier tasks, especially if I’m aware of the bigger ones, as it does seem like my mind works away in the background and when I get to it, I usually find it easier to get going with the more tricky tasks.
]]>I could have used a little more introduction of each of the guests at the top of the show. About 10 minutes into it, I figured out that Gabe was the Duck Duck Go guy, but I never identified Phil. Just a 1-minute introduction at the beginning would be good for panel shows.
]]>From what I did hear, it was a great discussion and I love the panel format, very lovely. Don’t give up your one-to-one chats though, listening to the two of you just kick back and have a banter was what really set the show apart for me.
Again, many thanks and I look forward to more excellent shows 🙂
]]>I want to punch the instructor.
]]>Have both him and Phil on more because both are awesome!
]]>I agree that we need to get into some more tech. We’ve been doing a lot of marketing stuff lately and I think it’s time to get hard core again. 😉
]]>Actually I was suprised Gabriel came back! I felt he maybe was a little turned off by the massive amounts of “unsolicited advice” in the interview he was in previously. Glad to hear thats not the case.
I think this one worked a lot better then the last. Possibly due to the guests. It was missing more of the tech focus (like how things work on the low level), but the attempts of marketing using Stumbleapon has saved me some cash.
]]>It’s still pretty important. After all, the history of serious astrobiology is really only 50 years old.
]]>I got my stumble upon costs wrong. I say that you can drive 3000 visitors to a page for $60, but the actual figure is 1,200 visitors for $60. So, to get 3000 visitors would cost $150. Still cheaper than spending 4 hours writing a blog post if your hourly rate is anything over $50 😉
]]>